Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.8 to 41.6.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1269 |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1255 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1265 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1238 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1285 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1273 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1245 |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1267 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1265 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.