Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 11, 2026. 3 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 20.9.
The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

GLM-4.7-Flash and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
Provider	Z.ai (Zhipu)	Moonshot AI
Noometry Index	38.8	43.3
Released	2026-01-19	2026-06-12
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	200K	262K
Max output	131K	262K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.06	$0.95
Output $ / M tokens	$0.40	$4
Results tracked	21	19

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE	—	30.5%
FrontierCode	—	30.1%
LMArena WebDev	—	1473
SciCode	—	47.5%
WeirdML	—	54.1%
LMArena Coding	1383	—
ALE-Bench	—	886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents	—	37.6%
GBAEval	—	0.9%
Vending-Bench 2	—	5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
Chess Puzzles	0%	21%
SimpleBench	—	57.9%
CritPt	—	10%
LMArena Hard Prompts	1356	—
Surface Evolver Bench	—	48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	58.3%	95.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	54%
FrontierMath Tier 4	—	12.2%
LMArena Math	1355	—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond	60.5%	87.9%
SimpleQA Verified	—	36.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate	9.3%	—
LMArena Expert	1357	—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English	1330	—
LMArena Chinese	1403	—
LMArena French	1332	—
LMArena German	1337	—
LMArena Korean	1283	—
LMArena Russian	1332	—
LMArena Spanish	1350	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following	1327	—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query	1345	—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text	1351	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1297	—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1125	—
LMArena Multi-Turn	1342	—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.