Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nova Premier 1.0

GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova Premier 1.0 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.4

Rank #175 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

37.7

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 70.3 to 66.9.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova Premier 1.0 specifications
GLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Amazon
Noometry Index38.437.7
Released2026-01-192025-04-30
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output131K10K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.40$12.50
Results tracked216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Coding1383—

Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224), Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1356—

Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159), Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202558.3%—
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1354—

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
GPQA Diamond60.5%—
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1357—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1331—
LMArena Chinese1403—
LMArena French1332—
LMArena German1336—
LMArena Korean1284—
LMArena Russian1333—
LMArena Spanish1351—

Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1327—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1345—

Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads

GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.7-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1351—
LMArena Creative Writing1297—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1125—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1342—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Nova Premier 1.0?

GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova Premier 1.0 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.4 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nova Premier 1.0?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper