Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
GLM-4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#117); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 34.3 to 26.4.
- GLM-4.7 is cheaper at $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-22 | 2026-09-29 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 205K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | $10 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74), GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 75.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | — |
| SciCode | 45.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96), GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 32% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 1.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.53 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1423 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1432 | — |
| LMArena German | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7 better than GPT-6.1 Sol?
GLM-4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#117); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GLM-4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.
Is GLM-4.7 or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 43.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and GPT-6.1 Sol share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 2.