Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Grok 4.1
GLM-4.7 and Grok 4.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 40.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 4.1 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.7 leads 43.6 to 33.4.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-22 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1445 |
| SciCode | 45.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 399.48 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96), Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 33.4% | — |
| Cybench | — | 39% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,377 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1436 |
| SimpleBench | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 1.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.53 | — |
Math GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1423 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1424 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 32.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.7% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75), Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1464 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1426 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1439 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90), Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1400 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1432 | 1416 |
| CL-bench | 15.9% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 10.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89), Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1413 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7 better than Grok 4.1?
GLM-4.7 and Grok 4.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 40.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.7 or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Grok 4.1 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.