Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 0 categories and Hy4 preview in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 38.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 6% for GLM-4.7 and 75% for Hy4 preview.
  • GLM-4.7 is cheaper at $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

GLM-4.7Hy4 preview
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index42.045.3
Released2025-12-222026-08-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K1.05M
Max output131K64K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.83
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$2.50
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev14351632
SciCode45.1%—
LMArena Coding1454—
ALE-Bench399.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103), Hy4 preview: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench33.4%—
Vending-Bench 22,377—

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
SimpleBench47.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—68.2%
CritPt1.7%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.51—

Math Hy4 preview leads

GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
ProofBench6%75%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.3%—
LMArena Math1423—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80), Hy4 preview: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
SimpleQA Verified32.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.7%—
LMArena Expert1424—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79), Hy4 preview: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1417—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1432—
LMArena German1424—
LMArena Japanese1439—
LMArena Korean1399—
LMArena Russian1423—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95), Hy4 preview: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
LMArena Instruction Following1411—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116), Hy4 preview: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
CL-bench15.9%—
CL-bench Life10.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1432—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93), Hy4 preview: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Hy4 preview
LMArena Text1435—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1413—
LMArena Multi-Turn1446—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7 better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or Hy4 preview?

GLM-4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is GLM-4.7 or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Hy4 preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper