Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Solar Pro4

GLM-4.7 and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Solar Pro4 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 39.8.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.7.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 205K.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.7Solar Pro4
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Upstage
Noometry Index42.042.1
Released2025-12-222026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K524K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$1.20
Results tracked3618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena WebDev14351371
LMArena Coding14541437
SciCode45.1%—
ALE-Bench399.48—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103), Solar Pro4: —

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
Terminal-Bench33.4%—
Vending-Bench 22,377—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14431399
SimpleBench47.7%—
CritPt1.7%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.51—

Math Too close to call

GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Math14231416
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.3%—
ProofBench6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Expert14241427
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
SimpleQA Verified32.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.7%—

Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Non-English14171361
LMArena Chinese14951415
LMArena French14321397
LMArena German14241364
LMArena Japanese14391309
LMArena Korean13991382
LMArena Russian14231360
LMArena Spanish14341401

Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following14111377

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14321381
CL-bench15.9%—
CL-bench Life10.9%—

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads

GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

BenchmarkGLM-4.7Solar Pro4
LMArena Text14351386
LMArena Creative Writing14011316
LMArena Multi-Turn14461385
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1413—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.7 better than Solar Pro4?

GLM-4.7 and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7 or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is GLM-4.7 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7 and Solar Pro4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7 has 36 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper