Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 43.8.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
GLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index54.836.5
Released2026-08-14—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding14961249
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Granite 4.0 H Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts14891240
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math14891247
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—
Omni-MATH—29.6%

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Expert15161251
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English14571216
LMArena Chinese15281249
LMArena Russian14631201
LMArena Spanish14601258
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following14771222
IFEval—89%

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query14821242

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text14711241
LMArena Creative Writing14571211
LMArena Multi-Turn14721242
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper