Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Longcat Flash Chat

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3 leads 46.1 to 19.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 74.2% for GLM-5.3 and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
GLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meituan
Noometry Index54.842.1
Released2026-08-14—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding14961471
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts14891440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14891442
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert15161454
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English14571404
LMArena Chinese15281465
LMArena French14991456
LMArena German14991408
LMArena Japanese14531373
LMArena Korean14721371
LMArena Russian14631395
LMArena Spanish14601445

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14771411

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14821425

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14711427
LMArena Creative Writing14571388
LMArena Multi-Turn14721418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Longcat Flash Chat?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Longcat Flash Chat share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper