Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 50.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Spark in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3 leads 62.3 to 47.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 49% for GLM-5.3 and 17% for Muse Spark.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark specifications
GLM-5.3Muse Spark
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meta
Noometry Index54.850.6
Released2026-08-142026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
SciCode59%51.5%
LMArena Coding14961481
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Muse Spark: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
CritPt19.1%11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14891474
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61152.04
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%88.9%
ProofBench49%17%
LMArena Math14891455
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
GPQA Diamond90.9%89.8%
LMArena Expert15161457
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
SimpleQA Verified41%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Too close to call

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English14571464
LMArena Chinese15281509
LMArena French14991497
LMArena German14991497
LMArena Korean14721459
LMArena Russian14631466
LMArena Spanish14601472
LMArena Japanese1453—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14771442

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14821451

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Muse Spark
LMArena Text14711474
LMArena Creative Writing14571459
LMArena Multi-Turn14721477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Muse Spark?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 50.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Muse Spark better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 46.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper