Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 27.1.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
GLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index54.829.7
Released2026-08-142024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14961039
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14891028
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14891089
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1516984
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14571000
LMArena Chinese15281016
LMArena French14991039
LMArena German14991006
LMArena Japanese1453899
LMArena Korean1472856
LMArena Russian14631004
LMArena Spanish14601059

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14771023

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1482996

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14711050
LMArena Creative Writing14571024
LMArena Multi-Turn1472989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper