Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Step 1o Turbo 202506 StepFun

39.7

Rank #160 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3 leads 62.3 to 36.6.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Step 1o Turbo 202506 specifications
GLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)StepFun
Noometry Index54.839.7
Released2026-08-14—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Coding14961339
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Step 1o Turbo 202506: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Hard Prompts14891335
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Math14891318
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Expert15161308
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Vision—1186

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Non-English14571313
LMArena Chinese15281380
LMArena German14991314
LMArena Russian14631327
LMArena French1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Instruction Following14771310

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Longer Query14821348

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Text14711336
LMArena Creative Writing14571307
LMArena Multi-Turn14721340
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 39.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper