Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3 leads 62.3 to 14.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 91.1% for GLM-5.3 and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
GLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index54.833.0
Released2026-08-142024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14961235
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14891220
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%4.4%
LMArena Math14891242
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
ProofBench49%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond90.9%46.3%
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1516—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14571236
LMArena Chinese15281249
LMArena Russian14631246
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14771233

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14821224

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14711256
LMArena Creative Writing14571231
LMArena Multi-Turn14721252
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper