Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Yi-Large

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5.3 leads 59.5 to 36.7.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and Yi-Large specifications
GLM-5.3Yi-Large
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)01.AI
Noometry Index54.838.1
Released2026-08-142024-05-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
CursorBench42.6%—
LMArena WebDev1622—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.7%
LMArena Coding1496—
BigCodeBench Complete—47.2%
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1489—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.61—

Math Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—
LMArena Math1489—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1516—
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
LMArena Non-English1457—
LMArena Chinese1528—
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1499—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1472—
LMArena Russian1463—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3Yi-Large
LMArena Text1471—
LMArena Creative Writing1457—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—
LMArena Multi-Turn1472—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than Yi-Large?

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GLM-5.3 or Yi-Large better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and Yi-Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper