Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.0 to 48.7.
  • GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
GLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index46.138.6
Released2026-02-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked4512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#52), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14611307
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5: 31.1 (#71), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 27.6 (#116), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14521286
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
Chess Puzzles10%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.83—
ForecastBench61—

Math GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 46.4 (#71), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14401281
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions65.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)16.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 52.3 (#64), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14541276
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 53.7 (#58), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14301265
LMArena Chinese15111346
LMArena Russian14361266
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1445—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1423—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 75.2 (#67), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14281277

Long Context GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.7 (#60), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14461341
CL-bench18.7%—

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 66.0 (#38), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14461288
LMArena Creative Writing14391264
LMArena Multi-Turn14561284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper