Model comparison
GLM-5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5 leads 49.0 to 36.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 48.2% for GLM-5 and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $3.20 for GLM-5.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.1 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2026-02-11 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5 leads
GLM-5: 49.0 (#52), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 48.2% | 34.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.1% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1434 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 69.7% | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.62 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5: 31.1 (#71), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 52.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 9.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 73.7% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 86.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,432 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5 leads
GLM-5: 27.6 (#116), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 53.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 44.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 10% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1452 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.83 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-5: 46.4 (#71), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 65.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 16.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5: 52.3 (#64), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-5: 53.7 (#58), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1430 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena German | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-5: 75.2 (#67), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5: 44.7 (#60), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 18.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-5: 66.0 (#38), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1439 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1601 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; GLM-5 lists at $1 and $3.20.
Is GLM-5 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.