Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Mercury
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 46.2.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1323 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1259 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1443 | — |
| LMArena German | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | 1238 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1264 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1186 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1283 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Mercury?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Mercury better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Mercury share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.