Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs MiMo-V2-Omni

GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
GLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Xiaomi
Noometry Index43.843.6
Released2026-04-012026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K262K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$4$0.28
Results tracked1918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding14661466
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts14431445

Math Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math14411430

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert14521449

Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision12641228
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English14201404
LMArena Chinese14881465
LMArena French14441447
LMArena German14231399
LMArena Korean13961355
LMArena Russian14311412
LMArena Spanish14501434
LMArena Japanese—1317

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following14231428

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query14381442

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text14371423
LMArena Creative Writing14161392
LMArena Multi-Turn14321445

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper