Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs o1
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and o1 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 55.8.
- GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), o1: 45.7 (#64)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: —, o1: 24.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), o1: 27.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1372 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), o1: 34.9 (#150)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), o1: 41.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), o1: 33.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), o1: 48.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1443 | 1343 |
| LMArena German | 1422 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | 1345 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), o1: 75.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), o1: 55.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than o1?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or o1?
GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 200K tokens.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and o1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.