Model comparison

GPT-3.5-turbo vs Llama 13b

Llama 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 24.4 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.2

Rank #350 Confirmed

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-3.5-turbo scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 13b in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-3.5-turbo leads 57.9 to 36.7.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-3.5-turbo and Llama 13b specifications
GPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index23.224.4
Released2023-03-012023-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window16K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked4421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Coding1136683
WeirdML3.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.6%—
HumanEval+70.7%—
MBPP+69.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Llama 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
METR Time Horizons21.5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1108728
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index118.55100.58
WinoGrande81.6%73%
Chess Puzzles0%—
Mystery Game Puzzles3%—
DTBench48.5%—
LMCA9.7%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
CommonsenseQA 2.057%—
ForecastBench50.4—
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%

Math Llama 13b leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Math1142838
GSM8K57.8%20.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.2%—
MATH Level 515.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.4%52.7%
BoolQ87%78.7%
MMLU71.4%47.7%
OpenBookQA86%56.4%
TriviaQA85.8%77.9%
GPQA Diamond28%—
LMArena Expert1070—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Non-English1108819
LMArena Chinese1075—
LMArena French1118—
LMArena German1090—
LMArena Japanese1043—
LMArena Korean1019—
LMArena Russian1123—
LMArena Spanish1121—

Instruction Following GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1119781

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1121—

Writing & Preference GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboLlama 13b
LMArena Text1125834
LMArena Creative Writing1092794
LMArena Multi-Turn1117753
EQ-Bench Creative Writing451—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Llama 13b?

Llama 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 24.4 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-3.5-turbo or Llama 13b better for coding?

GPT-3.5-turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 23.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Llama 13b share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper