Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Inkling-Small
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 39.0 to 10.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 3.5% for GPT-4.1 mini and 84% for Inkling-Small.
- Inkling-Small is cheaper at $0.45 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 524K.
- Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | 46.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 524K |
| Max output | 33K | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 47 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286), Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.4% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1451 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1408 |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52), Inkling-Small: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335), Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | 84% |
| CritPt | 0% | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | 18% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1424 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | 150.13 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
Math Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264), Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | 90% |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1453 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183), Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | 19.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1442 |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
Multimodal Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77), Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | 1235 |
Multilingual Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1400 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1458 |
| LMArena French | 1357 | 1438 |
| LMArena German | 1349 | 1412 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1291 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1426 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113), Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1332 | 1397 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
Long Context Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1401 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193), Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1341 | 1413 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1330 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | 1491 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1420 |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 mini lists at $0.40 and $1.60.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Inkling-Small better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Inkling-Small share?
30 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.