Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI

33.5

Rank #232 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 27.2 to 10.9.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index33.541.3
Released2025-04-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked4713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding13671417
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)23.9%—
Aider Polyglot32.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode40.4%—
WeirdML37.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
CadEval16%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52), Muse Glimmer: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard50.5%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts13491395
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%—
ARC-AGI-13.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LMCA21.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.01—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math13431419
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)6.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202544.7%—
Omni-MATH49.1%—
MATH Level 587.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert13381388
GPQA Diamond65.8%—
SimpleQA Verified12.7%—
MMLU-Pro78.3%—
GPQA (HELM)61.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77), Muse Glimmer: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1181—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English13181384
LMArena Chinese13291412
LMArena Russian13241393
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1291—
LMArena Korean1298—
LMArena Spanish1319—

Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following13321374
IFEval90.4%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query13441381
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text13411389
LMArena Creative Writing13001338
LMArena Multi-Turn13541398
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1147—
WildBench83.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 mini or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper