Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.9

Rank #327 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 3 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-4.1 nano leads 67.8 to 51.9.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nano and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
GPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index27.929.3
Released2025-04-142024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding13061101
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
SciCode25.9%—
WeirdML19%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12861100
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
ARC-AGI-10%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
LMCA5.5%—
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Too close to call

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math12741151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert12721067
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12601058
LMArena Chinese12701061
LMArena German12881080
LMArena Japanese1198966
LMArena Russian12611111
LMArena French—1135
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12671087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
IFEval84.3%—

Long Context Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12831088
Fiction.LiveBench25%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text12851110
LMArena Creative Writing12601083
LMArena Multi-Turn12771068
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 nano or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.9 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper