Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 21.7 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 19% for GPT-4.1 nano and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.7 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | 19% | 34.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | — |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3 Coder Next?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.
Is GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.