Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 OpenAI

35.7

Rank #215 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

39.9

Rank #145 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Step 3 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3 leads 27.6 to 11.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 52.3% for GPT-4.1 and 62.3% for Step 3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 and Step 3 specifications
GPT-4.1Step 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index35.739.9
Released2025-04-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$8—
Results tracked5217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

GPT-4.1: 34.2 (#228), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Coding13911367
SWE-bench Verified48.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)39.6%—
Aider Polyglot52.4%—
WeirdML39%—
CadEval42%—
ALE-Bench558.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#40), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard54%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#334), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts13841355
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
SimpleBench27%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
EnigmaEval2.2%—
DTBench68.3%—
LMCA25.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.79—
ForecastBench61.5—

Math Step 3 leads

GPT-4.1: 21.4 (#269), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

Knowledge Too close to call

GPT-4.1: 37.0 (#152), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Expert13641333
GPQA Diamond66.9%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
SimpleQA Verified31.1%—
MMLU-Pro81.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.6%—
GPQA (HELM)65.9%—

Multimodal GPT-4.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 37.5 (#66), Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Vision12101176
GeoBench72%—

Multilingual GPT-4.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 49.6 (#128), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Non-English13701327
LMArena Chinese13821396
LMArena German13801371
LMArena Korean13391271
LMArena Russian13771331
LMArena Spanish13751372
LMArena French1383—
LMArena Japanese1320—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GPT-4.1: 71.5 (#148), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following13671332
IFEval83.8%—

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#158), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Longer Query13851326
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 57.8 (#120), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Step 3
LMArena Text13831351
LMArena Creative Writing13631322
LMArena Multi-Turn13981340
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1420—
WildBench85.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 and Step 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper