Model comparison
GPT-4.5 vs Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 13.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 10.3% for GPT-4.5 and 87.2% for Grok 4.5.
Side by side
| GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 55.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-27 | 2026-07-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 39.4% | 46.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1474 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 44.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1553 |
| SciCode | — | 54.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 75.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,309 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |
Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | 34.5% | 70% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 10.3% | 87.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1403 | 1462 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 136.74 | 153.92 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 36% |
| EnigmaEval | 3.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 71.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 64.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |
| ForecastBench | 61.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 69% | — |
Math Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 37.8% | 97.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1412 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 24.4% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
| LiveBench Math | 69.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 78.6% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 68.7% | 93.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1394 | 1466 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 5.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.3% |
| Confabulations | 13.6% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1195 | 1288 |
| VPCT | 45% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1413 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1421 | 1496 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1457 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | 1419 | 1448 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1446 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 72.3% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1406 | 1463 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 63.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1394 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1258 | 1579 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1456 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 75.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 61.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.5 better than Grok 4.5?
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.5 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?
Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 42.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Grok 4.5 share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.