Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 13.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 37.8% for GPT-4.5 and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

GPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.245.3
Released2025-02-272026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked4232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding13961473
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14031460
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74147.37
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
LMCA—37.6%
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%93.3%
LMArena Math14121466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond68.7%87.9%
LMArena Expert13941467
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision11951279
VPCT45%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14131445
LMArena Chinese14211510
LMArena French14181473
LMArena German14571471
LMArena Japanese14161413
LMArena Korean13921415
LMArena Russian14191457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14041440
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14061455
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14171455
LMArena Creative Writing13941439
LMArena Multi-Turn14441460
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper