Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.1 to 35.0.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 8K.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 45.5 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 31.2 (#277), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1458 |
| WeirdML | 12.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 17.3 (#285), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 17.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.88 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 10.1 (#304), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1441 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | — |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 18.4 (#277), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1445 |
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | — |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 40.8 (#210), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1282 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1447 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 65.5 (#217), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1420 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#207), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 1430 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
GPT-4: 35.0 (#263), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1451 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.
Is GPT-4 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.