Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.6

Rank #186 Reported

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 30.3.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index38.638.6
Released2025-11-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena WebDev1337—
LMArena Coding—1307
ALE-Bench1,245—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Terminal-Bench60.4%—
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts—1286

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math—1281

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert—1276

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English—1265
LMArena Chinese—1346
LMArena Russian—1266

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following—1277

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query—1341

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text—1288
LMArena Creative Writing—1264
LMArena Multi-Turn—1284

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper