Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.2

Rank #178 Reported

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 37.4 to 29.3.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
  • GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and Hy3 specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexHy3
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index38.243.6
Released2025-11-122026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K262K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.13
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.53
Results tracked617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107), Hy3: 46.6 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena WebDev13371509
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena Coding—1465
ALE-Bench1,245—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32), Hy3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
Terminal-Bench60.4%—
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 25.0 (#134)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1449

Math Hy3 leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218), Hy3: 37.4 (#98)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math—1475

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 40.2 (#108)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Expert—1461

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 53.7 (#60)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Non-English—1427
LMArena Chinese—1496
LMArena French—1461
LMArena Korean—1390
LMArena Russian—1435
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 75.3 (#68)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Instruction Following—1425

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 44.1 (#70)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Longer Query—1443

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hy3: 62.5 (#75)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexHy3
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1399
LMArena Multi-Turn—1436

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 41.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Hy3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper