Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs MiniMax-M2.1

GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax-M2.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.6

Rank #186 Reported

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 38.0 to 27.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench: 60.4% for GPT-5.1-Codex and 36.6% for MiniMax-M2.1.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
  • GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax-M2.1 specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
ProviderOpenAIMiniMax
Noometry Index38.638.9
Released2025-11-122025-12-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K205K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$10$1.20
Results tracked622

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena WebDev13371384
ALE-Bench1,245623.83
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena Coding—1421

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench60.4%36.6%
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
NYT Connections (extended)—11.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1411

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math—1397

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%
LMArena Expert—1431

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English—1378
LMArena Chinese—1430
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1381
LMArena Japanese—1287
LMArena Korean—1298
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1397

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1400

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query—1416

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text—1392
LMArena Creative Writing—1361
LMArena Multi-Turn—1396

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than MiniMax-M2.1?

GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax-M2.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper