Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Grok 4.1
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 36.2.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1464 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1400 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Grok 4.1?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.