Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Phi-3.5-mini
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Phi-3.5-mini?
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.