Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 64× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 32.0.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 146.79 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | 2.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 64× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.