Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.2

Rank #34 Reported

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

30.8

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 27.8.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Pro and Wizardlm 13b specifications
GPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index52.230.8
Released2025-12-11—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$21—
Output $ / M tokens$168—
Results tracked810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding—1035

Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
ARC-AGI-254.2%—
SimpleBench57.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1018
Epoch Capabilities Index155.41—

Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74%—
FrontierMath Tier 446%—
LMArena Math—1017
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)31.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English—1034
LMArena Chinese—1023

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following—1049

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query—1054

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text—1077
LMArena Creative Writing—1090
LMArena Multi-Turn—1047

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper