Model comparison
GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 49.4.
Side by side
| GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1314 |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1299 |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1298 |
Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1289 |
Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1384 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1275 |
Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.