Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

GPT-5.3 Codex and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.8 vs 45.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.8

Rank #70 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 38.4.
  • Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index45.845.8
Released2026-02-052025-11-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena WebDev14091322
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1454
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—83.1%
LMArena Math—1429

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
GPQA Diamond—84.2%
LMArena Expert—1439

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Non-English—1398
LMArena Chinese—1456
LMArena French—1425
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1357
LMArena Korean—1330
LMArena Russian—1391
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following—1403

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Longer Query—1415

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Text—1415
LMArena Creative Writing—1374
LMArena Multi-Turn—1414

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

GPT-5.3 Codex and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.8 vs 45.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper