Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs MiMo-V2-Omni

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.5

Rank #61 Reported

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.5 to 42.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
  • GPT-5.3 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index45.542.9
Released2026-02-052026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K262K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.28
Results tracked818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.5 (#51), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
LMArena WebDev1408—
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1467
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 47.8 (#9), MiMo-V2-Omni: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts—1445
Epoch Capabilities Index156.84—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math—1432

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert—1449

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1469
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1318
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Russian—1412
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following—1428

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text—1424
LMArena Creative Writing—1393
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.3 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper