Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

44.8

Rank #69 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.4 to 34.9.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.838.1
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$4.50—
Results tracked4614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14381314
FrontierCode27%—
LMArena WebDev1397—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML60.3%—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
DeepResearch Bench36.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14241299
ARC-AGI-218.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)61.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Thematic Generalization61.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles11%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA40.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.83—
ForecastBench57—

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math14181298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 49.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench21%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)28.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert14341289
GPQA Diamond86.9%—
SimpleQA Verified29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14051265
LMArena Chinese14461314
LMArena German14071231
LMArena Japanese13751207
LMArena Russian14171271
LMArena French1440—
LMArena Korean1369—
LMArena Spanish1403—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14051275

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14071292

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14111299
LMArena Creative Writing13701262
LMArena Multi-Turn14291299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1665—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper