Model comparison
GPT-5.4 mini vs Step 3.5 Flash
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 8 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.4 to 39.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 61.8% for GPT-5.4 mini and 28.4% for Step 3.5 Flash.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini.
- GPT-5.4 mini accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.50 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | 1436 |
| FrontierCode | 27% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | 28.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1411 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 40.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.83 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63), Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1434 | 1422 |
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1440 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1407 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1375 | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | 1369 | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1385 |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | 1402 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | 1405 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Step 3.5 Flash?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 mini lists at $0.75 and $4.50.
Is GPT-5.4 mini or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 41.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 mini does, with 400K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Step 3.5 Flash share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.