Model comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Sonar

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #111 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

37.8

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 40.7 to 31.3.
  • GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • GPT-5.4 nano accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 nano and Sonar specifications
GPT-5.4 nanoSonar
ProviderOpenAIPerplexity
Noometry Index41.937.8
Released2026-03-172024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.20$1
Output $ / M tokens$1.25$1
Results tracked407

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 43.1 (#82), Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
SciCode46.9%—
WeirdML49.2%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1404—
ALE-Bench1,005—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 23.8 (#159), Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
ARC-AGI-25.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%—
ARC-AGI-151.5%—
CritPt9.3%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1380—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench80.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA36.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.78—
ForecastBench57.3—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 40.7 (#76), Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.8 (#94), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
GPQA Diamond78.5%—
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.1%—
LMArena Expert1397—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 36.0 (#73), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
LMArena Vision1196—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 48.8 (#136), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
LMArena Non-English1359—
LMArena Chinese1391—
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1368—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1321—
LMArena Russian1363—
LMArena Spanish1368—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GPT-5.4 nano: 72.1 (#139), Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1362—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#131), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
LMArena Longer Query1365—

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 55.9 (#137), Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoSonar
LMArena Text1372—
LMArena Creative Writing1313—
LMArena Multi-Turn1382—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Sonar?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 nano or Sonar?

GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is GPT-5.4 nano or Sonar better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 nano does, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper