Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 25.9.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.