Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Max costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 49.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 58.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 19% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper at $2.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | 70.4% |
| CritPt | 30% | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 19% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 153.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | 55.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1481 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Max?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Max costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 43.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.