Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 26.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 26.3% for GPT-5.5 Instant and 66% for Grok 4.6.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 56.9 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | 2026-08-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.6% | 56.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1465 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | 40% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1447 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | 156.44 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | 31.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1423 |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | 94% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | 1263 |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | 1452 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
Multilingual Too close to call
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1411 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | 1404 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1431 |
Long Context Grok 4.6 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1454 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1425 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Grok 4.6 better for coding?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Grok 4.6 share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.