Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Wizardlm 70b
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 62.0 to 34.9.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.7 (#73), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1081 |
| SciCode | 48.6% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.2 (#149), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1079 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.48 | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.1 (#241), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1116 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#68), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 39.3 (#48), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 53.0 (#76), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1410 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1430 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1430 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.4 (#94), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1407 | 1093 |
Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#92), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 62.0 (#81), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Wizardlm 70b?
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.7 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.