Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 124× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 73.3 to 22.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
- GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.07 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1445 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 124× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.