Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Mistral Large 3

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large 3 costs 180× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI

64.3

Rank #8 Confirmed

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

39.1

Rank #176 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 73.3 to 15.2.
  • Mistral Large 3 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Mistral Large 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3 specifications
GPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index64.339.1
Released2026-04-232025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$180$0.75
Results tracked1424

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
LMArena WebDev—1230
LMArena Coding—1448

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
SimpleBench76.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—7.5%
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
CritPt30.6%—
Chess Puzzles64%—
Thematic Generalization—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1429
DTBench96%—
LMCA53.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.07—

Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 478%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
LMArena Math—1414
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)52.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)39.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.5%
LMArena Expert—1421

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
LMArena Vision—1221

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
LMArena Non-English—1413
LMArena Chinese—1447
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1437
LMArena Japanese—1394
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1411
LMArena Spanish—1440

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
LMArena Instruction Following—1403

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
LMArena Longer Query—1413

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large 3
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1386
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1412
LMArena Multi-Turn—1429

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Mistral Large 3?

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large 3 costs 180× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Mistral Large 3?

Mistral Large 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral Large 3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper