Model comparison

GPT-5-Codex vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5-Codex OpenAI

37.3

Rank #190 Reported

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

40.9

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 30.0.
  • Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper at $0.20 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
  • GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-5-Codex and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
GPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Noometry Index37.340.9
Released2025-09-152025-06-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K128K
Max output128K30K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.20
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.50
Results tracked332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena WebDev—1241
WeirdML54.5%—
LMArena Coding—1411
ALE-Bench—394.93

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 Fast leads

GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66), Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
Terminal-Bench44.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
SimpleBench—56%
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1407
DTBench—87.7%
ForecastBench—61

Math Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%
LMArena Math—1408

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%
LMArena Expert—1398

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English—1391
LMArena Chinese—1441
LMArena French—1416
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1347
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1411

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following—1376

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query—1390

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text—1408
LMArena Creative Writing—1394
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327
LMArena Multi-Turn—1389

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5-Codex better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5-Codex or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper