Model comparison

GPT-5-Codex vs Inkling

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5-Codex OpenAI

37.3

Rank #190 Reported

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #75 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5-Codex scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.6 to 30.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 54.5% for GPT-5-Codex and 32.3% for Inkling.
  • Inkling is cheaper at $1.87 / $4.68 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
  • GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 66K.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5-Codex and Inkling specifications
GPT-5-CodexInkling
ProviderOpenAIThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index37.344.1
Released2025-09-152026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K66K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.87
Output $ / M tokens$10$4.68
Results tracked341

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100), Inkling: 34.1 (#229)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
WeirdML54.5%32.3%
FrontierCode—14%
LMArena WebDev—1412
FrontierSWE—4.1%
SciCode—47%
LMArena Coding—1463
ALE-Bench—946

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66), Inkling: 29.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
Terminal-Bench44.3%—
APEX-Agents—33.8%
τ²-bench Banking—25%

Reasoning Inkling leads

GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80), Inkling: 40.6 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
ARC-AGI-2—36.5%
SimpleBench—50%
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—79.5%
CritPt—5.4%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1452
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.6

Math Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Inkling: 31.2 (#198)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—0%
LMArena Math—1482

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Inkling: 55.2 (#44)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
GPQA Diamond—88.3%
SimpleQA Verified—40.3%
LMArena Expert—1468

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Inkling: 54.2 (#49)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
LMArena Non-English—1434
LMArena Chinese—1495
LMArena French—1453
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1428
LMArena Korean—1401
LMArena Russian—1430
LMArena Spanish—1442

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Inkling: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
LMArena Instruction Following—1427

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Inkling: 43.9 (#79)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
LMArena Longer Query—1436

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Inkling: 65.5 (#48)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexInkling
LMArena Text—1443
LMArena Creative Writing—1390
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1611
EQ-Bench 4—1226
LMArena Multi-Turn—1436

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5-Codex better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or Inkling?

Inkling is cheaper. It lists at $1.87 per million input tokens and $4.68 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5-Codex or Inkling better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Inkling share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper