Model comparison
GPT-5 vs Grok 4
GPT-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.9 to 48.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 46 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 46 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 4 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where GPT-5 leads 46.8 to 33.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GeoBench: 81% for GPT-5 and 45% for Grok 4.
Side by side
| GPT-5 | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 50.9 | 48.1 |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 69 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-5: 50.3 (#47), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 88% | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | 60.7% | 45.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1436 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 65% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1418 | — |
| SciCode | 42.9% | — |
| GSO | 6.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,162 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.67 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
GPT-5: 33.1 (#56), Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 49.6% | 27.2% |
| GDPval | 34.8% | 21.1% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.6% | 47.3% |
| BALROG | 32.8% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | 1133 | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | 69.6% | 66.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| Remote Labor Index | 1.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
Reasoning GPT-5 leads
GPT-5: 38.3 (#64), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 9.9% | 16% |
| SimpleBench | 56.7% | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.7% | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 65.7% | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 37% | 28% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150 | 146.44 |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | 60.9 |
| CritPt | 12.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 10.5% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 12.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 23% | — |
| DTBench | 90.7% | — |
| LMCA | 40% | — |
Math GPT-5 leads
GPT-5: 55.0 (#44), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.4% | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | 64.7% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1422 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 32.4% | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 12.5% | 2.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| ProofBench | 18% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 98.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 leads
GPT-5: 56.6 (#43), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.2% | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | 10.3% | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 79.2% | 72.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1419 | 1415 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 25.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 50.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 14.7% | — |
Multimodal GPT-5 leads
GPT-5: 46.8 (#13), Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1232 | 1210 |
| GeoBench | 81% | 45% |
| VPCT | 66% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GPT-5: 51.4 (#110), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1397 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1422 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1410 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1416 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1409 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1377 |
| LMArena Russian | 1406 | 1410 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1399 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
GPT-5: 73.8 (#113), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 87.5% | 94.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1388 | 1387 |
Long Context GPT-5 leads
GPT-5: 69.5 (#2), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | 94.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1399 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5 leads
GPT-5: 63.4 (#65), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1406 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1365 | 1397 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 86% | 76.9% |
| WildBench | 85.7% | 79.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1426 | 1416 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1627 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 better than Grok 4?
GPT-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.9 to 48.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 or Grok 4 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (50.3 vs 50.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 and Grok 4 share?
46 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 has 69 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.